Legal Opinion

Blackstone v. Standard Life & Accident Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1889PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Lane, J.) Assumpsit upon accident insurance policy. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff brought her action upon a policy of insurance, the material parts relating to this case reading as follows:

“In consideration of the representations made in the application for this insurance, and of the sum of twenty-five dollars, this company hereby insures Daniel L. Blackstone, Esq., residing at Adrian, county of Lenawee, and State of Michigan, hereinafter styled the insured, by occupation, profession, or employment a traveling salesman, * * ' * in the principal sum of five thousand dollars for the term of twelve months, commencing at 12 o'clock noon on February 27, 1886, the said…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Accident Insurance v. CrandalSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Bigelow v. Berkshire Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Life Insurance v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Insurance Co. v. RodelSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Hathaway's Administrator v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  2. Hoffman v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Olsson v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Ann Arbor Trust Company v. North American Company for Life and Health Insurance, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Knapp v. Order of PendoWashington Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API