Legal Opinion

Hunt v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1892No. 410PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Crumpacker, J. —

This is a prosecution under the statute for the prevention of cruelty to animals. The affidavit charges that on the 10th day of December, 1890, in Sullivan county, Indiana, Arthur Hunt did then and there “ unlawfully and cruelly shoot and injure a certain dog,” the, property of one Clinton Bicknell, “ by then and there shooting said dog with leaden shot and killing him.”

The trial resulted in a conviction of the defendant, and he appeals.

‘No question is raised respecting the sufficiency of the affi*384davit, so we intimate no opinion thereon. But it is contended that the evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McClellanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Grise v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  3. Stephens v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1887
  4. State v. BogardusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. State v. BurkWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. PraterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Theoret v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API