Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McClellan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 15, 1869PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, C. J.

The brevity of the indictment has raised a question as to its sufficiency. It alleges that the defendant, a+ the time and place named, “ did cruelly beat a certain horse, against the peace of the Commonwealth and contrary to the form of the statute,” &c. The statute referred to is § 41 of the Gen. Sts. c. 165. It provides that “ whoever cruelly beats or *35tortures any horse, ox or other animal, whether belonging to himself or another, shall be punished,” &c. It is suggested that the word “beat” does not of itself describe with sufficient certainty the alleged act, because it may refer to a race…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  2. People v. FaustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. GouldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API