Legal Opinion

Railway Officials & Employees' Accident Ass'n v. Coady

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 7, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit.—Trial in the Circuit Court of Champaign County; the Hon. Francis W. Wright, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Burroughs

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action of assumpsit by Kate R. Coady, the plaintiff, against the Railway Officials and Employees’ Accident Association, the defendant, in which she recovered in the Circuit Court of Champaign County, a verdict ■ and judgment for $1,026.52. The appellant prosecutes an appeal to this court and urges us.to reverse that judgment on the grounds that the verdict is against the evidence, the'court refused to admit proper evidence offered by the defendant, and gave improper and refused proper instructions.

The declaration…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Healey v. Mutual Accident Ass'n of the NorthwestIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Friberg v. DonovanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crandall v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  2. Miner v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  3. Semmons v. National Travelers' Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Zeigler v. Clinton Mutual County Fire Ins.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API