Legal Opinion

Dugger v. Panola County Board of Supervisors

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1925No. 24688PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

This is an appeal by a taxpayer, F’oster Dugger, from an order of the board of supervisors of Panola county, allowing- the chancery clerk thereof compensation for services as county auditor for each judicial district of that county as provided by section 2206, Code of 1906 (Hemingway’s Code, section 1891). This section provides that in counties having two judicial districts certain officers, including the chancery clerk, may be allowed compensation for services as county auditor for each judicial district ; the chancery clerk being the ex officio county auditor.

The board of supervisors made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scharrenbroich v. Lewis & Clark CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Richards v. PattersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Johnston State Revenue Agent v. BrownsMississippi Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Belknap v. ShockWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Weems v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  3. (1974), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1974
  4. Board of Sup'rs v. City of Bay St. LouisMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API