Seieroe v. Homan
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe district court of Douglas county-Heard below before Ferguson, J. Tbe opinion contains a statement of tbe case. Tbe court erred in applying to the case at bar the doctrine announced in Bohn Mfg.
Read the full summary
Appeal from tbe district court of Douglas county-Heard below before Ferguson, J. Tbe opinion contains a statement of tbe case. Tbe court erred in applying to the case at bar the doctrine announced in Bohn Mfg. Co. v. Kountis, 30 Neb., 719. (Henry & Goatsworth Co. v. Fisherdick, 37 Neb., 207; Holmes v. Hutchins, 38 Neb., 601; Pickens v. Plattsmouth Investment Co., 37 Neb., 272; Hoagland v. Lowe, 39 Neb., 397.) References as to right of subrogation: Johnson v. Barrett, 117 Ind., 551; Gilbert v. Gilbert, 39 la., 657; Fears v. Albea, 69 Tes., 437; Walker v. King, 44 Vt., 601; Wheeler v. Willard,…
1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.
Suit was commenced in the district court for Douglas county by Niels Seieroe agáinst William R. Homan for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon lot 1, in block 362, in the city of Omaha, the facts alleged as the plaintiff’s cause of action being substantially as follows: On the 1st day of April, 1890, the plaintiff: entered into a contract with Homan, as owner of the premises above described, whereby he agreed to furnish certain material and perform certain labor in the erection of six three-story brick and frame apartment houses upon said premises for the sum of $10,221, payable upon…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bohn Sash & Door Co. v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kent v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Arlington State Bank v. PaulsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Skinkle v. HuffmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- American Surety Co. v. State Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.