Legal Opinion

Skinkle v. Huffman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1897No. 7341PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the district court of York county. Heard below before Whéeler, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.

This was an action by the appellant, Martha Skinkle, in the district court for York county upon an interest coupon of a prior mortgage paid by her in order to pro- . tect her own security. Appellant, on the 23d day of February, 1891, in an action then pending in- said court in which Melintus H. Kealiher and wife were defendants, *21secured the entry of a decree foreclosing her second mortgage. The first mortgage for $2,000 executed by Kealiher and wife to the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company (hereafter called the insurance company) not having matured, said company was not made a party…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Bohn Sash & Door Co. v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Carter v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  4. Cason v. LaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. South Omaha National Bank v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shelter Insurance Companies v. FrohlichNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Union Cent. Life Ins. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. Arlington State Bank v. PaulsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Western Coach Corp. v. RexrodeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Marks v. Baum Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API