Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Solis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 8, 1991No. 2-89-1356Published

1Concurrence

PRESIDING JUSTICE REINHARD,

specially concurring:

While I agree with the majority that the trial court erroneously granted defendant’s motion for discharge based on an alleged speedy-trial violation, I write specially to set forth more precisely my own reasons for reaching that conclusion.

I believe, like the majority, that the proper analysis begins by reference to the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision in People v. Bowman (1990), 138 Ill. 2d 131. In Bowman, defendant’s court-appointed attorney withdrew from the case and was replaced by another attorney approximately three weeks before the date…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BowmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mid-American Lines, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. RobertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. People v. CollumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. People v. McGuireAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API