Legal Opinion

State v. Rowe

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 7, 1984PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

On July 14, 1983, a Cumberland County jury found Timothy Rowe guilty of Hindering Apprehension or Prosecution (Class B), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 753(1)(C) & (2) (1983), for his participation in the destruction of evidence relating to a murder committed in Windham. 1 The defendant appeals the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict claiming that he was twice put in jeopardy for the same offense in violation of his constitutional rights. Me. Const, art. I, § 8. We agree and vacate the conviction.

By indictment dated January 13, 1983, the defendant was charged with the murder of Michael…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. City of Portland v. JacobskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. State v. FlickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. State of Maine v. Wai ChanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API