Legal Opinion
State v. Flick
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 12, 1985PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOLNIK, Justice.
Defendant Daniel Flick was charged with Obstructing Government Administration, 17-A M.R.S.A. 751 (1983), and has had two jury trials in Superior Court (Kennebec County). Each ended in the declaration of a mistrial. Following the second trial the Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that a third trial would violate the double jeopardy clause of the Maine Constitution, Article I, § 8, and of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Superior Court denied the motion. Flick appeals under an exception to the final judgment rule, State v. Hanson,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. CattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- State of Maine v. Wai ChanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- State v. TellierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Callaway v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.