Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Helvie

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1971No. 870A124PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowdermilk, J.

This appeal involves two cases which were consolidated and tried by the trial court.

After the institution of the suits Toy Arnett died and later his widow, appellant Mary Lee Arnett, was appointed Executrix of his estate and the Executrix was substituted as party plaintiff. The cases were tried some six years after their commencement.

Thomas M. Callahan, a banker and defendant in the original actions, died before trial, after which Richard L. Helvie was appointed Executor of his estate and substituted as party defendants. Appellants, Arnetts, who were farmers, sought to recover farm land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Voss v. EllerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Yount v. YountIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. In RE ANNEXATION ETC. v. City of AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Kratli v. BoothIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. BURGIN v. DriesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bemis Co., Inc. v. RubushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Thomas v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cressy v. Shannon Continental Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Central Indiana Carpenters Welfare Fund v. EllisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. In Re the Adoption of GraftIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API