Legal Opinion
Conille v. Pierce
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 16, 1986No. 85-2389-KPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, District Judge.
Plaintiff is a former tenant of an apartment in the Washington Apartments project in Dorchester. The Washington Apartments project was one of a group of five residential building projects, collectively known as the Granite Properties, which were rehabilitated in the late 1960s with mortgage loans insured by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). The loans were made as part of the Below Market Insurance Rate (“BMIR”) program, 12 U.S.C. § 1715Í (d)(3), of the National Housing Act (“NHA”), 12 U.S.C. § 1701, et seq. Under the BMIR program, a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marie Conille v. Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- 1610 CORP. v. KempDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991