Legal Opinion

Edm v. Tam

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 16, 1992No. 23603Published

1Opinion of the Court

307 S.C. 471 (1992)

415 S.E.2d 812

E.D.M., Respondent

v.

T.A.M., Appellant.

23603

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard January 20, 1992.

Decided March 16, 1992.

Kathleen P. Jennings, Greenville, for appellant.

Robert M. Rosenfeld of Porter & Rosenfeld, Greenville, for respondent.

Heard Jan. 20, 1992.

Decided March 16, 1992.

MOORE, Justice:

This is an action for separate support and maintenance. Appellant (Husband) appeals the denial of his counterclaim for an annulment and the award of alimony and attorney's fees to respondent (Wife). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Wife commenced this action…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Rutherford v. RutherfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Davis v. WhitlockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API