Legal Opinion

McClanahan v. McClanahan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1946No. 3731PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The appeal to this court is on questions of law and fact, and is submitted upon a transcript of the evidence taken in the Common Pleas Court and a little additional evidence taken in this court.

The essential relief sought by plaintiffs, appellants herein, is an accounting. The defense is essentially twofold. First, it is claimed that there is no proof of a contract between the parties sufficient to justify the granting of any relief; and, second, that the purpose of the principal plaintiff, Earl McClanahan, in entering into whatever arrangement was made, was to hinder, delay and defraud his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roman v. MaliCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  2. Langley v. DevlinWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wuliger v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Katz v. BanningOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Freedline v. CielenskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Hasselschwert v. HasselschwertOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. In Re HooverUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API