Legal Opinion

GUARDIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. Rubinstein

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1963No. 3153, 3154Published

1Opinion of the Court

192 A.2d 296 (1963)

GUARDIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Earl J. Lombard, David Eugene Kenney and Louise Burke, Appellants,

v.

Harry I. RUBINSTEIN, Appellee.

GUARDIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Earl J. Lombard, David Eugene Kenney and Louise Burke, Appellants,

v.

Joseph E. KAPLAN, Appellee.

Nos. 3153, 3154.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Reargued April 17, 1963.

Decided June 19, 1963.

Earl J. Lombard, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Mark P. Friedlander, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mark P. Friedlander and Blaine P. Friedlander, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees.

Before HOOD,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. PopkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. CorrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API