Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Pa Consulting Group, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 14, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2004-1245Published

1Opinion of the Court

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 9 10 JUDITH BARNETT 11 Plaintiff Civil Action No. 04-1245 (BJR) 12 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 PA CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 This matter comes before the court on Defendant PA Consulting Group, Inc.’s (“PA”) 19 Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 20 Local Rules for the District of Columbia 7.1 and 56.1. From October 2000 to November 2003, 21 Plaintiff Judith Barnett worked as a Managing…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API