Legal Opinion

Modlin v. Twin Falls Canal Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1930No. 5389PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Ralph Modlin, claimant and respondent, was by the Industrial Accident Board awarded compensation against respondent, Twin Falls Canal Company, and its surety, State Insurance Fund, appellant. The State Insurance Fund having appealed, the district court found that the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were true and correct, and affirmed the award. From the judgment entered, the State Insurance Fund again appealed.

The errors assigned may be reduced to two main contentions, viz.: that, when injured, claimant was a special employee of respondent, Clear Lakes Syndicate, and not the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Driscoll v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Billing v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Stewart v. California Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pinson Ex Rel. Pinson v. Minidoka Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Moon v. ErvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Dewey v. MerrillIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Dameron v. Yellowstone Trail Garage, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API