Carroll v. Polfus
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Harlan county: Ernest B. Perry, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
Action for specific performance of a contract for the exchange of real estate. The defense is that at the time the contract was entered into the defendant was in such a state of intoxication that he was incapacitated from entering into a contract or exercising judgment, and that the value of the property taken in exchange for that of defendant was and is grossly inadequate in value. At the request of defendant a jury was impaneled to make special findings of fact, which are as follows:
“If you find that the defendant did sign the contract, at the time it was signed was he so intoxicated that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Bank v. GreenNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- Kountze v. ErckNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rhoades v. State Real Estate CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Taylor v. KoenigsteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Walter v. GillanNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- United Mineral Products Co. v. Nebraska Railroads of Western Trunk Lines CommitteeNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- In re WorleyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.