Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Koenigstein

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1935No. 29162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was originally brought after the death of Edmund H. Sattler by the duly appointed administrator of his estate against Jack Koenigstein as sole defendant. Two causes of action are set forth in the petition filed. In both, Sattler, the decedent, is alleged to be an incompetent, in the following language: “That said Sattler was an incorrigible spendthrift, and at the time of receiving said cash (April 11 to 15, 1930), and for several years immediately prior thereto had been a habitual drunkard and dipsomaniac, and was wholly incompetent to care for, conserve and manage said estate.”

Th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Benton v. SikytaNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Johnson v. PhiferNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. O'Donnell v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Hauber v. LeiboldNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. MeyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. James v. UNKNOWN TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Tyrell v. SauríSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
  4. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Tyrell v. SauríSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API