Legal Opinion

Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1992No. D-0489Published

1Opinion of the Court

841 S.W.2d 343 (1992)

Betty Parr RUSSELL, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Donnon O'Neal Russell, Deceased, et al., Petitioners,

v.

INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, et al., Respondents.

No. D-0489.

Supreme Court of Texas.

October 14, 1992.

Rehearing Overruled December 9, 1992.

Michael Y. Saunders, John W. Tavormina, Carl D. Kulhanek, Jr., Richard P. Hogan, Jr., Helm, Pletcher, Hogan, Bowen & Saunders, Houston, for petitioners.

Max E. Roesch, Thomas B. Taylor, Taylor & Eggleston, Laurie B. Easter, Hutcheson & Grundy, Houston, Gordon R. Pate, Karen L. Spivey, Pate & Dodson, Beaumont,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Doggett; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Gammage.

2Cases cited106 opinions

  1. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Duhart v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API