Rutledge v. Krauss
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause why the arrest of the defendant should not be set aside and the defendant discharged from imprisonment thereunder.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fort, J.
Gustav Adolph Krauss was indicted by the grand .jury of Hudson county for malpractice. After the offence was committed be left the State of New Jersey and went to the State of New York. While in New York he was indicted. Formal application was made by the executive of the State of New Jersey to the executive of the State of New York for his extradition as a fugitive from justice. He was surrendered and lodged in the Hudson, county jail.
While thus held a civil suit was instituted against him by Laura Rutledge, the person upon whom the alleged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. RauscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lascelles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Adriance v. . LagraveNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- In re CannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Williams v. BaconNew York Supreme Court · 1834
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hart v. Oliver Farm Equipment Sales Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- In re HendersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Glaze v. GlazeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- In re FlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Thomas v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.