Legal Opinion
Hodges v. CIT Group (In Re Hodges)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 4, 2006No. 19-02231PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A. BENJAMIN GOLDGAR, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the court for ruling is the motion of defendant CIT Group pursuant to Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) (made applicable by Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7012(b)), for judgment on the pleadings on the adversary complaint of debtor Mark J. Hodges. In his complaint, Hodges seeks to rescind his mortgage with CIT based on federal and state statutory violations he claims occurred when the loan was made. CIT argues that because judgment has already been entered in its favor in its state foreclosure action against Hodges, this court lacks jurisdiction…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, Stephen Leucke, Brian R. Hedman, and Karl KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Federación De Maestros De Puerto Rico v. Junta De Relaciones Del Trabajo De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Randall v. Bank One National Ass'n (In Re Randall)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- EMC Mortgage Corp. v. KempIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Estate of YucisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- William Penn Apartments, L.P. v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Archer BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.