Ward v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Justice.
Appellant, Curtis Ray Ward, was indicted for aggravated possession of marihuana and for possession of marihuana on which no tax had been paid. In a plea in bar and an application for writ of habeas corpus, appellant asserted that the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution barred his prosecution for these offenses. The trial court denied relief. This Court affirmed. The Court of Criminal Appeals refused appellant’s petition for discretionary review. However, the United States Supreme Court…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Maximiliano Sanchez-Escareno, Adolpho Ayala Sanchez and David Garcia LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- State v. Rocha, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- People v. MaurelloColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Jensen v. BoukerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Ledford v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.