Legal Opinion

Roszell v. Roszell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1886No. 11,938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Zollars, J. —

While in the army during the late war, appellee contracted for the purchase of the real estate in controversy in this action. Before his return, it was deeded to *78his then infant son, appellant. In 1877, appellee claiming that the property belonged to him, and that the conveyance to the son had been made by mistake, brought an action to recover the property and to have the title quieted in him.

A guardian ad litem was appointed for appellant, and such proceedings were had that a commissioner was appointed to convey the legal title to ajípellee. The commissioner made a deed which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Ex Parte Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Vail v. LindsayIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Roszell v. RoszellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Stingley v. Nichols, Shepard & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Tate v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API