Legal Opinion

Arco Industries Corp. v. American Motorists Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1999No. Docket 210651PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, J.

This case is before us on rehearing, limited to part vm of our most recent opinion in this dispute, Arco Industries Corp v American Motorists Ins Co (On Second Remand), 232 Mich App 146, 170-171; __ NW2d __ (1998). In part vin, we originally held that, in accordance with the language of the majority opinion in Yaldo v North Pointe Ins Co, 457 Mich 341; 578 NW2d 274 (1998), Arco was entitled to collect twelve percent penalty interest pursuant to MCL 500.2006; MSA 24.12006. Upon further review, we conclude that our reliance on Yaldo was misplaced. We now affirm the trial court’s determination…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Yaldo v. North Pointe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Fletcher v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance v. Stenberg Bros.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Yaldo v. North Pointe InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Griswold Properties, LLC v. Lexington InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Federal Insurance Company v. The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection And Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. McNeel v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Angott v. Chubb Group of Insurance CompaniesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Michigan Township Participating Plan v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API