Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Mail Handlers Benefit Plan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1996No. 1950843PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert Lambert appeals from a summary judgment for the defendants in this fraud case.

The facts of the case as outlined in the record, the briefs, and the trial court order indicate the following. Before 1981, Robert Lambert, a Federal employee, chose to be insured under a contract with the Mail Handlers Benefit Plan ("MHBP"), one of a number of insurance plans available to Federal employees. In 1981 Lambert became disabled because of a work-related accident, and he retired in that year under the terms of the Civil Service Retirement Act. A Federal employee who retires under this Act because…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Dgb, LLC v. Michael HindsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Freightliner v. Whatley Contract CarriersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Aliant Bank v. Four Star Invs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  5. Ex Parte Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API