Marriage of Choa Yang Xiong v. Su Xiong

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant argues that the district court clearly erred by finding that respondent was his putative spouse. Because the record contains evidence of respondent’s good-faith belief that she was legally married to appellant, we affirm.

FACTS

On December 8, 2009, respondent Choa Yang Xiong (Yang)1 commenced this ac*188tion against appellant Su Xiong (Xiong), seeking determinations of custody, parenting time, child support, spousal maintenance, and division of property on the theory that she was Xiong’s putative spouse. Xiong denied that Yang was his putative spouse, and a…