Legal Opinion

Kenny v. Martin Gillet & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 3, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.

The appellees, Martin G-ille.t & Co., tea dealers, in Baltimore City, obtained a decree for injunction in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City, restraining the appellant, Cornelius D. Kenny, from using certain cylindrical bags containing tea for sale, with certain labels, with devices upon them, which tea was called Hi-Hi,” because the Court held appellant’s bags, devices and labels to be fraudulent simulations of the appellee’s trade-mark, bags and labels, for the sale of their iCHeNo” tea. Erom that decree this is an appeal.

The conclusion we have reached renders it unnecessary for us to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Siegert v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  3. Hobbs v. FrancaisThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
  4. Palmer v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Prince Manufacturing Co. v. Prince's Metallic Paint Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Nelson v. J. H. Winchell & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Mascaro v. Snelling & Snelling of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Interstate Distilleries, Inc. v. Sherwood Distilling & Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. Mundon v. Taxicab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API