Legal Opinion
Pound v. Airosol Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 21, 2007No. 06-3299PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
In this citizen-suit action, Plaintiffs-Appellants Robert Pound and Pro Products, Inc. (collectively “Pro Products”) challenge an order of the district court declining to impose a monetary penalty against Defendant-Appellee Airosol Company, Inc. (Ai-rosol) for violations of the Clean Air Act (CAA, or “the Act”). Pro Products also challenges the district court’s order denying its request for attorney fees and costs. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings.
I
Pro Products sells habitat control products for exotic…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States of America, United States of America, State of Louisiana, Intervenor-Appellee v. Marine Shale Processors, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. v. Powell Duffryn Terminals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Scottsdale Insurance v. TolliverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Paulo v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Inc. v. ExxonMobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Utah Physic. for Healthy Env't v. Diesel Power GearCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Sierra Club v. KHANJEE HOLDING (US) INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.