Legal Opinion
Mutual Lumber Co. v. Poe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1933No. 6985Published
1Opinion of the Court
66 F.2d 904 (1933)
MUTUAL LUMBER CO.
v.
POE, Internal Revenue Collector.
No. 6985.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
September 6, 1933.
Charles E. McCulloch, Ivan F. Phipps, and Carey, Hart, Spencer & McCulloch, all of Portland, Or., for appellant.
Anthony Savage, U. S. Atty., of Seattle, Wash., Joseph A. Mallery, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Tacoma, Wash., and Jeffrey Heiman, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Seattle, Wash. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., and John R. Wheeler, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Seattle, Wash., of counsel), for appellee.
Before…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCloskey v. Pacific Coast Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Mutual Lumber Co. v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Yangtsze Rapid S. S. Co. v. Deutsch-Asiatische BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Mutual Lumber Co. v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- E. E. Atkinson & Co. v. WillcutsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.