Legal Opinion

Weston v. Hasty

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1965No. 533PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, C.J.

The intent of the testator is the polar star that must-guide the courts in the interpretation of a will. VonCannon v. Hudson Belk Co., 236 N.C. 709, 73 S.E. 2d 875, and cited cases. This intent is to be gathered from a consideration of the will from its four corners, and such intent should be given effect unless contrary to some rule of law or at variance with public policy. House v. House, 231 N.C. 218, 56 S.E. 2d 695; Williams v. Rand, 223 N.C. 734, 28 S.E. 2d 247; Heyer v. Bulluck, 210 N.C. 321, 186 S.E. 356.

In order to understand conditions as they existed at the time A. J. Furr executed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. In Re Accounting of Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Williams v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Union National Bank v. MossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API