Legal Opinion

Royal Loan Ass'n v. Forter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 6, 1904No. 13,472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Marshall district court; Sam Kimble, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, 0. J.:

The Royal Loan Association was a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Missouri, with' its principal office located in the city of St. Joseph. It organized a local board with a local secretary' and treasurer at Marysville, Kan. About *469August 14, 1895, Samuel Forter applied to John H. Cole, the local secretary and collector at Marysville, Kan., for a loan of $400. On his application he obtained the sum of $382.75, and he and his wife executed a bond and a mortgage on real estate at Marysville, Kan., to secure the payment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meroney v. Atlanta Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Washington Investment Ass'n v. StanleyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Building & Loan Ass'n of Dakota v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Fidelity Savings Ass'n v. SheaIdaho Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Weygandt v. BartleOregon Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hansen v. DuvallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SolomonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Central States Building & Loan Ass'n v. BitlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Holmes v. Royal Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API