Legal Opinion
Dunham v. Ottinger
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosch, J.
This action is submitted upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts. The purpose of the action is to prevent an attempted investigation by the Attorney-General as to claimed fraudulent practices of the plaintiff in respect to stocks, bonds, other securities and commodities.
Acting under the provisions of article 23-A of the General Business Law (added by Laws of 1921, chap. 649), the Attorney-General caused to be issued a paper in the form of a subpoena, requiring the plaintiff to appear before him to testify in regard to the practices of the plaintiff, and commanding him to bring the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Harriman v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Caldwell v. Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re MacNamaraNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- Carlisle v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935