Legal Opinion

Tisdale v. Rogers

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 2023No. 6:20-cv-00020Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RONALD TISDALE, Petitioner, v. Case No. 20-CV-020-JFH-DES MIKE ROGERS,1 Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER Petitioner Ronald Tisdale (“Tisdale”), a state prisoner appearing pro se,2 brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking federal habeas relief. See Dkt. No. 1; Dkt. No. 2. Respondent Mike Rogers (“Respondent “) filed a response in opposition to the petition [Dkt. No. 19], as well as the state-court record [Dkt. No. 20]. Having considered the parties’ arguments and the relevant record, the Court denies the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API