Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gettis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1950No. Appeals, Nos. 32, and 53 to 66PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

The defendant, an inspector in the office of Fire Marshal in the City of Philadelphia, was convicted on fifteen counts of an indictment charging extortion.

The Act of 1911, P. L. 705, 53 PS §3591 et seq., established the office of Fire Marshal in the City of Philadelphia, and provided for the appointment of the Fire Marshal and assistants and inspectors. Pursuant as the statutory authority the city provided for the posi*517tion of fire marshal inspector to which the defendant was appointed by the director of public safety after he had passed a civil service examination. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SaulsburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Finley v. McNairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. HopkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. GallagherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Commonwealth v. LawtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Commonwealth v. NeffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Commonwealth v. CostelloPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API