Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. McNeill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 1951No. 4-9348PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is an action by the appellants to cancel an oil and gas lease which they executed to appellee McNeill on April 7, 1949. The lease was for a term of six months and as long thereafter as oil or gas was produced in paying quantities. The lessee paid nothing for the lease, the instrument containing this provision: “The consideration for the execution of this lease is: Lessee agrees • to begin the drilling of a well . . . before the 15th of May, 1949, and to continue . . . with due diligence ... to a depth of 5,000 feet unless oil or gas in paying quantities is found at a lesser depth. It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watson v. RochmillTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Wilson v. HolmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frost v. Gulf Oil Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Sorum v. SchwartzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Saulsberry v. SiegelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Inman v. Milwhite Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1967
  5. Wilson v. TalbertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API