Legal Opinion

Voorhies v. Hennessy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1893No. 1060PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Suprior Court, Ghehalis County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

Appellant Hennessy, as constable, had levied upon certain personal property claimed by respondent under certain attachments and executions issued at the suit of other appellants, in actions brought by them against one Dunbar. The property consisted of four oxen, with yokes and chains, which had been the property of respondent, and while owned by him hired to Gray & Emerson. Some *244weeks before the levy respondent gave Dunbar an absolute bill of sale of the property, and directed Gray & Emerson to pay the subsequently accruing hire to him. Upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cadman v. PeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. McCormick v. HerndonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Sewell v. Price's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  4. Silsby v. AldridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Burke v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dawson v. McCartyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Denny v. HoldenWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Doolittle v. J. C. Murray & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Morrison v. PierceIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Barnes v. PackwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API