United States v. Roa
United States Court of Military Appeals
1ConcurrenceCook, Judge
My Brothers say that “[o]ur cases . . . have made it perfectly clear that attempted murder requires a specific intent to kill.” 12 M.J. 210, 212. In my opinion, the generalization is misleading. It may properly be applied only to a specification alleging an attempt to effect the type of murder specified in subdivision (2) of Article 118, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 918(2). It has no application, however, to an attempt to commit the type of murder specified in subdivision (3) of the article.
Although the form of each of the specifications in issue brings this case within…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. RoaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HempUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. FloydUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.