Chicago Cottage Organ Co. v. Caldwell
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Page District Court. — Hon. A. B. Thornell, Judge. Action on a written contract for the purchase price of a piano. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
I. The plaintiff brings its action upon the following contract: “Contract. Chicago Cottage Organ Company is not responsible for any yerbal or written contract or promise, other than written or printed on the face of this contract. July 29, 1894. For value received, I, the undersigned, residing in Malvern, county of Mills and state of Iowa, promise to pay to the order of the Chicago Cottage Organ Company four hundred and no hundredths dollars, at their office in Chicago, Illinois, as follows: One Packard organ, at one hundred dollars ($100.00), and balance of three hundred dollars ($300.00) in…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Shores-Mueller Co. v. LonningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Brooks v. Brotherhood of American YeomenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- James & Haverstock v. DalbeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Murphy v. OlberdingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Peterson v. Phillips Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.