Legal Opinion

Andersch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1997No. CR-96-2057PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Kenneth Andersch, appeals from the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., in which he challenged his guilty-plea convictions for first-degree sodomy and first-degree sexual abuse.

The appellant originally pleaded guilty to two counts of sodomy in the first-degree and four counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. He was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment for each of the sodomy convictions and to 5 years' imprisonment for each of the sexual abuse convictions. The sentences were to run concurrently. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Cantu v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Ex Parte IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Sheats v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Ex Parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  3. Clemons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Ex Parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. V.R. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API