Legal Opinion

Sliney v. Davis

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1898No. 1388PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

Though the facts found be accepted as entirely true, and *481the legal principle on which the decree was based be accepted, the decree as entered does not on the record correctly determine the rights of the parties. The counsel who drew it apparently overlooked one of the fundamental propositions which always controls a settlement of the accounts and rights of the mortgagor and mortgagee. Before the mortgagee can be compelled to surrender his title he must receive the money secured by the instrument. The force of this suggestion will appear as we state the case and formulate our conclusions.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. McMurtrie v. RiddellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  3. Jerome v. Carbonate National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. Wahrenberger v. WaidColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Esty v. CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API