Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Brooke
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 11, 2003No. Misc. AG No. 36, Sept. Term, 2002Published
1Opinion of the Court
821 A.2d 414 (2003)
374 Md. 155
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND,
v.
John A. BROOKE.
Misc. AG No. 36, Sept. Term, 2002.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
April 11, 2003.
Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel and Gail D. Kessler, Asst. Bar Counsel for the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, for petitioner.
Benjamin Lipsitz, Baltimore, for respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE,[*] RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ.
RAKER, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition with this Court for disciplinary action against respondent alleging…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Warren B. Sheinkopf v. John K.P. Stone Iii, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- DeVaux v. American Home Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Kurtenbach v. TeKippeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.