Legal Opinion

Mohr v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2015No. S-15-0008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, Justice.

[11] In the final phase of the general adjudication of water rights in the Big Horn River, the Wyoming Board of Control (the Board) recommended elimination of certain unused and unadjudicated water rights under Farmers Canal Permit 854 (Farmers Canal Permit), including the rights to irrigate Tract 109, now owned by Appellant Frank E. Mohr. Since at least 1922, Tract 109 has been irrigated under Permit 3712E (the Perkins Ditch Enlargement). In conjunction with his application for that permit, Mr. Mohr's predecessor submitted his affidavit acknowledging that water under the Farmers…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Campbell v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In Re Big Horn River SystemWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kathy S. Crofts v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Game and FishWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In the Interest of: DT and NT, Minor Children. ST v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To HLL and KGS, Minor Children: CLB v. State of Wyoming, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Casey Charles Peak v. Amanda Ann PeakWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  5. In Re: The General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System and All Other Sources, State of WyomingFrank E. Mohr v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API