Legal Opinion

Means v. Limpia Royalties

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1938No. 13675PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by Mrs. Arclissa C. Means, a feme sole, and Mrs. Elizabeth Armstrong, joined by her husband, O. C. Armstrong, against the Limpia Royalties, an unincorporated association, operating under a declaration of trust, organized under the laws of the state of Oklahoma, and with its principal office in the city of Tulsa, and W. E. Templeman and N. E. Temple-man, residing in Tulsa county, Okl., and Sam F. Means, residing in El Paso county, Tex.,' trustees of said association, for rescission and cancellation of a certain deed executed by J. S. Means,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Kelley v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Mason v. PetersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Culbertson v. BlanchardTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Union Trust Co. v. GrosmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Plains Cotton Cooperative Ass'n v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Moore v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Looney v. WingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Petrey v. John F. Buckner & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API