Legal Opinion
Looney v. Wing
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 7, 1946No. 14778PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
We are confronted at the outset of this appeal with a motion to strike the statement of facts, based on the contention that two purported transcripts of the evidence have not been approved by the parties or by the trial court. The transcripts in question were filed in this court on April 20, 1946. The motion to strike was filed on May 24, 1946. Rule 404, of the present procedural rules, which is old Rule 8 for Courts of Civil Appeals, provides.:
“Motions Relating to Informalities in Record. All motions relating to informalities in the manner of bringing á case into…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Crowley v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Phœnix Oil Co. v. McLarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Kountze v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pacific Fire Insurance v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Roberson Farm Equipment Company v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Englander Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Punch v. GerlachTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Associated Sawmills, Inc. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.