Legal Opinion
Lancaster v. Zufle
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 26, 1996No. 95 Civ. 3932 (JSR)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
On July 29, 1996 the Court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action herein, finding this to be “a classic case for summary judgment.” Lancaster v. Zufle, 932 F.Supp. 109, 113 (S.D.N.Y.1996). On October 18, 1996, defendant filed a motion under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking sanctions against plaintiff in the amount of $17,500 to cover expenses in defending the instant litigation. In her moving papers, defendant concedes that she failed to formally comply with the “safe harbor” provisions of Rule 11,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- George Hadges, William M. Kunstler v. Yonkers Racing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Sears Realty Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Lancaster v. ZufleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jeffreys v. RossiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Gal v. Viacom International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Weeks Stevedoring Co. v. Raymond International Builders, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- In Re Jazz Photo Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.