Yuanzong Fu v. Rhodes
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Judge:
€ 1 Clyde Rhodes, Joseph Naso, and Rene Naso Evans (collectively, Defendants) appeal from an Order and Judgment, claiming that the trial court abused its discretion by striking their Answer and entering judgment against them as a discovery sanction pursuant to rule 37 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. See Utah R. Civ. P. 37(0)(@). In the alternative, Defendants contend that even if the sanction was otherwise appropriate, the trial court erred by entering judgment because Yuanzong Fu's Complaint fails to set forth factual allegations supporting the relief requested. We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- American Towers Owners Ass'n v. CCI Mechanical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yuanzong Fu v. RhodesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Wisan v. City of HildaleUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Aspenbrook Homeowners Ass'n. v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Gallegos v. BrewskisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026
- Yuanzong Fu v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013