Legal Opinion

Breiterman v. Breiterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

On February 14, 1933, the plaintiff brought this action against her husband to recover $3,650 due under a separation agreement dated July 28, 1930, being the difference between the weekly payments made to her by the defendant, her husband, and the weekly payments required to be made by the terms of the agreement. On January 9, 1933, the plaintiff began an action for a separation and applied for and obtained alimony and counsel fees, which have been paid by the husband. In her complaint in the separation action she charges abandonment since May 29, 1930, and non-support in that defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Bernstein v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Graves v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Hurst v. Trow's Printing & Bookbinding Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  5. Newport v. NewportNew York Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pignatelli v. PignatelliNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Manning v. ManningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Holahan v. HolahanNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Sockman v. SockmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API