Hurst v. Trow's Printing & Bookbinding Co.
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from trial term. . Two actions by Thomas D. Hurst against Trow’s Printing & Bookbinding Company, John W. Lovell, and Edward Lange. From a judgment for plaintiff in each action, entered on a verdict directed by the cSurt, and from orders denying motions for a new trial, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.
The two actions were tried together and were founded upon two promissory notes given by John W. Lovell under an agreement between himself and the plaintiff which provided, among other things, that, during the period of three years after the date of the contract, Lovell was to have the exclusive right to have impressions printed from certain plates belonging to Hurst, and that during the same period the latter should not publish, directly or indirectly, any' works competitive to those covered by the terms of the contract; and for these exclusive rights the agreement provided that Hurst should…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fowler v. . Bowery Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Graves v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Finlay v. SwirskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Hall-Scott Motor Car Co. v. Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Hamilton v. Park & McKay Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Breiterman v. BreitermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.