Legal Opinion

George v. Veach

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1984No. 8321DC348PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Plaintiffs’ sole contention is that the court erred in granting directed verdict for defendant-builder on the implied warranty claim. We agree, and accordingly reverse.

In this jurisdiction an implied warranty accompanies the sale of newly constructed dwellings.

[I]n every contract for the sale of a recently completed dwelling . . . the vendor, if he be in the business of building such dwellings, shall be held to impliedly warrant to the initial vendee that, at the time of the passing of the deed or the taking of possession by the initial vendee (whichever first occurs), the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Wheeler-Leonard & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Rutledge v. DodenhoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. Lane v. Trenholm Building CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Hinson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lempke v. DagenaisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. Everts v. ParkinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Nichols v. R.R. Beaufort & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Lumsden v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Design Plus Store Fixtures, Inc. v. Citro Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API